CNN.com - Top Stories

rewiew etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster
rewiew etiketine sahip kayıtlar gösteriliyor. Tüm kayıtları göster

7 Ocak 2014 Salı

Yol and sociology

Mustafa Enes Şahin

YOL AND SOCIOLOGY
            Yol is a 1982 movie and directed by Yılmaz Güney. In 1982, there was a kind of tyranny in Turkey so; story of the movie is about some prisoners lives who were arrested at that time by government. Moreover, context of the movie reflects gender roles and also we can understand 1980s Turkish society’s perspective on gender and sex.
            First of all, sex is biological or genetic component while gender is constructed by society, meaning that society determines the behavior, think or feeling of men and women. For example, in the movie Mevlüt who is one prisoner go to Gaziantep in order to see his fiancee. When he goes to home then, all men who are in the house eat dinner but women do not eat and they just serve men. This situation is normal for them because society construct this situation. At that time, people thought that each woman must serve their husband. In addition, Mevlüt and his fiancée go jaunt and Mevlüt explains his expectation of his fiancée. He says that “We'll marry as soon as I get released. As the head of the family my word counts. You'll have to accept everything I say. You won't talk to men or joke with them. I'll get mad. You won't talk with other men except for you brothers and closed relatives. You'll do what I say. You won't go against my word. I will determine what you will do and put on.”. This conversation shows that Mevlüt dominant character of family. We can say that there is a kind of patriarchy because males exploiting women’s labour in the household and excluding women from public life. Consequently, According to Mevlüt, his roles take care of his wife and interfere in his wife’s private life. The position of Mevlüt is head of the family.
            Secondly, Seyit Ali’s wife is good example of gender roles. When Seyit Ali arrested his wife left her children and cheated on someone. We can understand from that, female roles are taking care of her children and becoming loyal wife to her husband. Her wife was punished for these crimes. They did not give any food and let her to do bath. They did not see her as human being any more. In addition, Seyit Ali’ wife did not resist this situation. She consented to do nothing and just waiting die. In this direction we can say that women are not questioning their gender roles. They do not aware of themselves. Woman roles just take care of her children and become royal wife. The position of women is a kind of servant for the society.
To conclude, Entire of the movie men dominate women. According to society men are superior to women.    











Women in Turkish Society
Since the establishment of the Turkish Republic in the 1920s, women have had equal status with men in Turkish society, at least in law.
But Turkish society was ruled by shari'a (Islamic religious law) and a body of medieval social custom for 500 years during the Ottoman Empire, and significant cultural change does not come overnight.
The status of women in Turkey is different from what it is in your home country. Not "better," not "worse," but different. In some ways, women may seem subservient to men; but Turkey had a female supreme  court justice long before the USA did, and Turkey has had a female head of government, something the USA, for all its success in women's liberation, has not yet had.
Men's and women's roles were clearly defined in traditional Turkish society and each gender was more or less sovereign within its appropriate realm. The husband-father was head of the household, but the wife-mother was in charge of the house and family. Men went out of the house to deal with the world of business, government and military; women stayed close to home and tended the crops, the animals and the household.
The ranking, behavior and appropriate attitude for each family member was clearly defined: imperious mother-in-law, submissive youngest child, etc. (It was the same even in the sultan's palace: although the sultan was the monarch, it was his mother, the Valide Sultan, who decided which harem girls he would sleep with, and when!)
 Village Women, Turkey
Girl on the Street, Istanbul, Turkey


Atatürk's reforms hoped to blast these centuries-old traditions to smithereens, and to liberate women completely so they could participate in every aspect of society equally with men.
The veil was outlawed; civil marriage and divorce were established; Turkish women obtained the right to vote (long before women in Switzerland had that right), to hold political office, and to bequeath and to inherit wealth in their own right.
Though these reforms weredramatically effective, society does not change easily or quickly, and even Atatürk's bold, foresightful measures could not change everyone's thinking all at once.
Arranged marriages are still common in the countryside and among the more traditional, religious families, although in the cities modern ideas of girl-boy courtship, love and marriage are not uncommon. Female virginity upon marriage is valued (and often expected), though it is not universal anymore.
In Turkey, as in most societies—even the ones thought to be most liberal in their attitudes toward women—you'll find a range of attitudes toward women.
If you, a foreign female visitor, observe Turkish cultural norms (ie, behave as a Turkish woman would behave), you will be treated with politeness and respect.
Whether you do this or not, you will probably be in far less physical danger in Turkey than you'd be in many more "liberal" countries.






Germinal and Sociology

Mustafa Enes Şahin



GERMINAL AND SOCIOLOGY
            Emile Zola’s novel Germinal was published in 1885 and this novel have been adapted for cinema in 1993. The writer mentions about workers life and working condition. He explains at that time France social structure. In my opinion this book is very useful source in order to answer these questions: Why do we need sociology? And Why do we need     theories in sociology?

           
            First of all, we live in the society. We need each other help in order to continue our lives easily. Therefore we have to understand people’s problems, requirements. Above all we should understand ourselves, our identity, and our place in society. Sociology enables us to understand all of these things. For example in Germinal movie; society divided by two class; upper class and lower class. Upper class represents mine owners in the movie. Lower class contains miners in the movie. This situation creates social stratification. In addition, mine owners employs miners with very low wage because of that all family members have to work even if they children. In other words, upper class controls lower class. All these things cause to query lower class their condition. That is why we need sociology because we can explain this society via sociology.


            Secondly, theories are very important element of sociology because they enable us to understand and explain the social world. For example, in the movie worker class internalize Karl Marx’s theory because they are against capitalist system. They want more salary and more rights. Therefore, we can understand their problem with Karl Marx’s theory that is why we need theories in sociology.

           
            To conclude, sociology enable to us understand society and theories make possible to explain our World, our society. Both of them are essential part of our lives.


           


 




                

The Impossibility of the Future in Science Fiction Genre

Mustafa Enes Şahin


The Impossibility of the Future in Science Fiction Genre
From the beginning of science fiction, scholars and devotees questioned about what it is exact definition of the genre and its exact definition is still a kind of contested question. Today, they are questioning about its functions. Some people believe that science fiction should be for the present others say that it should be for the future. From my point of view, science fiction should be for the present. Firstly, most science fiction stories are about current political and it gives a kind of useful message to readers and audience. Secondly, the genre reflects some ethical issue such as private life or freedom. Thirdly, science fiction shows danger of current innovation in science and technology. Lastly, some people assert that science fiction predict the future and that is why it should be for the future but, I do not agree with this perspective.
            First of all, some science fiction movies comments directly upon the contemporary twenty first century politics. In addition, Science fiction has always done that for example, some 1950s science fiction films reflects their era’s political issues. When World Collide, The Day the Earth Stood Still and War of the Worlds are products of the period when the atomic bomb was used and the hydrogen bomb was developed and tested. These movies show the historical realities of the fifties. For example War of the Worlds representation of the failure of the nuclear weapons and The Day the Earth Stood Still mentions about President Truman decision about using of the atomic bomb against Japan. Consequently, these movies show their era’s political issue and give a kind of useful information about 1950s political events for audiences. That is why science fiction should be for present. Moreover, twenty first century science fiction products are also about politics such as Avatar. This movie gives messages about human beings have to preserve their connection to nature and private militaries can get out of control easily. This example is related to contemporary politics because today, it is obvious that we do not care the nature.
            Secondly, science fiction genre mentions about its era’s ethical issue. For instance, technology becomes more powerful some ethical questions arise from this process such as human genome cloning. This topic mentions in Andrew Nicoll's movie Gattaca. This movie released in 1997 and just as the sequencing of the human genome neared completion. The prevalence of genetic alteration in Gattaca generates a division of social class. The social system in Gattaca is based on your genetic makeup and the way you were born. People born the way as natural are "in-valids"; on the other hand people born with the assistance of genetic engineering are "valids." An "in-valid" has his future set out to be a cleaner or other insignificant job in society which doesn't require an education and this class is seen as second class. This class discrimination is example of the ethical problems. In addition, another example of the ethical issue is 1984 which is George Orwell novel. It published in 1949 and at this time communism raised some region on the earth. George Orwell represents ethical problems of communist system. For example, in 1984 novel The Party quell all physical sensations of love and this limitation referred “duty to the Party” by The Party. This is a kind of birth control program and in 1949 Communist Party constituted this program in China. In this direction, we can say George Orwell criticizes this system in his book and this system was stared to implement at this time. This is restricted the freedom. Moreover, in Ray Bradbury’s novel which is “A Sound of Thunder” reflects unethical problem in term of law. According to the book “If you disobey instructions, there’s a stiff penalty of another ten thousand dollars, plus possible government action, on your return.” (Bradbury 1). If a man disobeys instruction which is no touching anything at the past otherwise everything will be changed. This is very important and serious problem but government instead of shut down this company; he put a kind of temporary laws. In my opinion, in this way the author criticize like this laws which are unethical. 
            Thirdly, science fiction genre reflects danger of both current technological and scientific developments such as Terminator movie. This movie represents the danger of artificial intelligence and genetic modification. Terminator a kind of robot and he looks like man. His main duty destroys the mankind. This movie released 1984 and this time robotic industry and genetic modification was developing so, this movie’s content developed through at that time technological and scientific improvements. In addition, today some science fiction stories are about some mad scientists. These scientists cause of epidemic a kind of intelligent bacteria or viruses. Moreover some science fiction movies are about the apocalyptic vision and this vision also helps us aware of the possibilities of world destroying. 
            Lastly, some people asset that the future can be predictable. For example, according to John Huntington’s article, which is “Science Fiction and the Future”, “William Rupp takes it as a “favorable sign” that 48% of a sampling of English professors defined SF as “a type of story that . . . tries to anticipate the impact of future technological developments on society” Some recent guides to the future go so far as to insist that anyone who expects to cope with the future at all must read SF. “ Science Fiction should be required reading for Future 1,” declares Alvin Toffler. Arthur C. Clarke maintains that “A critical . . . reading of science fiction is essential training for anyone wishing to more than ten years ahead” ” (Huntington 345). These writers believed that future can predictable and science fiction did this. They assert that science fiction prepares us for future but I do not agree with this idea. Firstly, we cannot say anything about the future without the present because the present is source of our information, our imagination. Secondly, you cannot predict something which is always changing such as technology. Technology is developing everyday a little more. For example, in the past there is room shaped computer and their only function was basic calculation but now we have mobile computers and they have a lot of qualities. I do not think this can be predictable. According to William Gibson who is author of Neuromancer and Zero History “I think the least important thing about science fiction for me is its predictive capacity. Its record for being accurately predictive is really, really poor! If you look at the whole history of science fiction, what people have said is going to happen, what writers have said is going to happen, and what actually happened — it’s terrible. We’re almost always wrong.” (Boble, Ariel)
            To conclude, science fiction stories mentions about political problems, some ethical issue and danger of both technological and scientific developments. All of them developed their present times and that is why we can say that science fiction should be for present. It enables us to understand all these things. In addition, some people say that this genre predict the future but, they cannot explain how can be predictable something which is always changing. Consequently, future cannot be predictable.






Works Cited
Bogle, Ariel. “William Gibson says science fiction is almost always wrong.” mhpbooks.com. Web. September 18, 2012
Bradbury, Ray. “A Sound of Thunder”. Retrieved on 12 June 2010 from:
Huntington, John. (1975). “Science Fiction and the Future.” College English, Vol. 37, No. 4, 345- 352.